Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video160.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Sehl results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Begging the Question, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 170.055 faulty-reasoning hits from 160.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (23,969 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben Sehl is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Ben Sehl
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 160.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510015.5% percentile
11.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos160.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.9%11.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 4.6%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos