Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Potter results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 56% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 166 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,895 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben Potter is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Ben Potter
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
32.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 56.0%56.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 29.8%29.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 56.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos