Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video109.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Morse results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 195.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠20% (22,895 of 28,364 speakers). This Ben Morse is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group.
Ben Morse
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 109.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510019.3% percentile
13.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos109.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.8%12.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos