Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Lieberman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 153.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,694 of 26,881 speakers). This Ben Lieberman is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Ben Lieberman
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos