Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These BELPOL results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Unattributed Quote, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.3% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 242.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,416 of 28,364 speakers). This BELPOL is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
BELPOL
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos