Speaker summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bell Media results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 38.5% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 30 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 38.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,227 of 28,364 speakers). This Bell Media is worse (more manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Bell Media
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.9% percentile
38.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 38.5%38.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos