Speaker summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Becky Sullivan results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 122.528 hits . Analysis detected 531.861 faulty-reasoning hits from 651 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,554 of 28,364 speakers). This Becky Sullivan is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Becky Sullivan
Speaker details
Total words: 651
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos651 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 18.8% 18.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst