Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video1,185.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beatriz Ochoa results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,644.28 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,185.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,832 of 28,364 speakers). This Beatriz Ochoa is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group.
Beatriz Ochoa
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠2%Beatriz Ochoa (selected)5%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 1,185.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.9% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos