Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barry Tanner results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 74.2% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 342.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,475 of 28,364 speakers). This Barry Tanner is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Barry Tanner
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
41.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 74.2%74.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 51.6%51.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.8%25.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 74.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 51.6%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos