Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Peterson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 55.5 hits. Analysis detected 208.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 65% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,433 of 28,364 speakers). This Barbara Peterson is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Barbara Peterson
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
65.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos