Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bajrakitiyabha results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 191.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,484 of 28,364 speakers). This Bajrakitiyabha is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Bajrakitiyabha
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Composition/Division: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 1.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos