Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bagdasarian results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Self-Serving Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (385 of 28,364 speakers). This Bagdasarian is worse (more manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group.
Bagdasarian
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510098.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos