Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bader Al-Saif results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Composition/Division, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 146 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,433 of 28,364 speakers). This Bader Al-Saif is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Bader Al-Saif
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
19.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 7.5%Composition/Division: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos