Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Azadeh Erfani results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 64.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,503 of 28,364 speakers). This Azadeh Erfani is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Azadeh Erfani
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos