Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video232.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin Kulp results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, False Dilemma, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.5% saturation with 89.625 hits. Analysis detected 497.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 232.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,684 of 28,364 speakers). This Austin Kulp is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Austin Kulp
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 232.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.5% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos232.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.5%38.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.3%12.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.8%10.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos