Speaker summary
⁠74%2 analyzed articles/videos238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aurora police results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.4% saturation with 138.923 hits. Analysis detected 268.923 faulty-reasoning hits from 238 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,230 of 28,364 speakers). This Aurora police is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Aurora police
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠22%Aurora police (selected)15%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 238
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
14.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos238 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 58.4%58.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 58.4%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos