Speaker summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos322.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Audrey Pulvar results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 81.936 hits. Analysis detected 981.326 faulty-reasoning hits from 322.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,505 of 28,364 speakers). This Audrey Pulvar is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Audrey Pulvar
Speaker details
Total words: 322.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
7.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos322.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Tu Quoque: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Red Herring: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos