Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These attorneys results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 63.5% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,063 of 28,364 speakers). This attorneys is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
attorneys
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.4% percentile
32.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 63.5%63.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 39.2%39.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 63.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 39.2%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos