Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Atanas Zapryanov results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Burden of Proof, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,219 of 28,364 speakers). This Atanas Zapryanov is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Atanas Zapryanov
Speaker details
Total words: 52.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos