Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Astra Press results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (339 of 28,364 speakers). This Astra Press is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Astra Press
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510098.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos