Speaker summary
83%3 analyzed articles/videos494.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Hinson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 140.554 hits. Analysis detected 1,340.612 faulty-reasoning hits from 494.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Ashley Hinson is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group.
Ashley Hinson
Speaker details
Total words: 494.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.0% percentile
8.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos494.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.9%18.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.5%Straw Man: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate