Speaker summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 494.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Hinson results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 140.554 hits . Analysis detected 1,340.612 faulty-reasoning hits from 494.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 9% (25,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Ashley Hinson is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Ashley Hinson
Speaker details
Total words: 494.5
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 8.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos494.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 28.4% 28.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 19.0% 19.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.2% 18.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.9% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst