Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Bell results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.3% saturation with 101.25 hits. Analysis detected 462.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 46.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (10,573 of 28,364 speakers). This Ashley Bell is worse (more manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Ashley Bell
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510062.7% percentile
46.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos