Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ASEAN results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Optimism Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 126 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (319 of 28,364 speakers). This ASEAN is worse (more manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
ASEAN
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510098.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos