Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video291.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arthur Engoron results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 98.83 hits. Analysis detected 514.83 faulty-reasoning hits from 291.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,514 of 28,364 speakers). This Arthur Engoron is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Arthur Engoron
Speaker details
Total words: 291.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
7.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos291.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos