Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video26.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arizona Housing Coalition results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 22.5 hits. Analysis detected 62.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 26.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,327 of 28,364 speakers). This Arizona Housing Coalition is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Arizona Housing Coalition
Speaker details
Total words: 26.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos26.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos