Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video106 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Araluen Schunmann results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Status Quo Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 77.4% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 256 faulty-reasoning hits from 106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,790 of 28,364 speakers). This Araluen Schunmann is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Araluen Schunmann
Speaker details
Total words: 106
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
40.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos106 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 77.4%77.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 41.5%41.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 41.5%41.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.6%22.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 77.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 41.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos