Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video482.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Antonio Freeman results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 980.638 faulty-reasoning hits from 482.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,259 of 28,364 speakers). This Antonio Freeman is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Antonio Freeman
Speaker details
Total words: 482.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos482.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos