Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Tata results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Authority, and Burden of Proof, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 67.5 hits. Analysis detected 247.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 70% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,829 of 28,364 speakers). This Anthony Tata is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Anthony Tata
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
70.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos