Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video110.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Garvey results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 66.1% saturation with 83.25 hits. Analysis detected 244.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 110.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,479 of 28,364 speakers). This Anthony Garvey is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Anthony Garvey
Speaker details
Total words: 110.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
21.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos110.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 66.1%66.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 66.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos