Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne Schuchat results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 23.314 hits. Analysis detected 49.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,067 of 28,364 speakers). This Anne Schuchat is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Anne Schuchat
Speaker details
Total words: 61.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
18.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos