Speaker summary
43% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne Kim results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 308.39 hits . Analysis detected 3,333.665 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,559 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (27,676 of 27,744 speakers). This Anne Kim is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Anne Kim
Speaker details
Total words: 3,559
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score10 analyzed videos3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst