Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video166.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne Hedges results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Confirmation Bias, and Genetic Fallacy, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.4% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 573.059 faulty-reasoning hits from 166.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (24,982 of 37,442 speakers). This Anne Hedges is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Anne Hedges
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠34%Anne Hedges (selected)20%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 166.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
20.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos166.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 54.4%54.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.4%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos