Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video16 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Paulina Lina results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 16 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (268 of 28,364 speakers). This Anna Paulina Lina is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Anna Paulina Lina
Speaker details
Total words: 16
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos16 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos