Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Feuerbach results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 109 faulty-reasoning hits from 109 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,305 of 28,364 speakers). This Anna Feuerbach is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Anna Feuerbach
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠22%Anna Feuerbach (selected)15%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 109
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.4% percentile
14.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos109 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 5.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos