Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video83.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Johnson results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Special Pleading, False Dilemma, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 167 faulty-reasoning hits from 83.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,103 of 28,364 speakers). This Ann Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Ann Johnson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 83.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
35.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos83.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 79.3%79.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 79.3%79.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 79.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 79.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9%Special Pleading: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos