Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ann Davison results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Circular Reasoning, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 56.7% saturation with 44.25 hits. Analysis detected 163.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,185 of 28,364 speakers). This Ann Davison is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Ann Davison
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
38.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 56.7%56.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 52.4%52.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 56.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 8.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 0.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos