Speaker summary
ā 77%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angus Johnston results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Pessimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 54 hits. Analysis detected 178.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ā 82% (5,323 of 28,364 speakers). This Angus Johnston is worse (more manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group.
Angus Johnston
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 82%Angus Johnston (selected)75%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos