Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angie Walters results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 226 faulty-reasoning hits from 198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (20,852 of 26,348 speakers). This Angie Walters is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Angie Walters
Speaker details
Total words: 198
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.9% percentile
14.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos198 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.0%32.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 16.0%16.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos