Speaker summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos106.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angie Mummaw results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 80.2% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 354 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,384 of 28,364 speakers). This Angie Mummaw is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Angie Mummaw
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 106.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.4% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos106.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 80.2%80.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 59.9%59.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 40.1%40.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 80.2%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 59.9%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos