Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos56.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Green results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 56.1% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 92.044 faulty-reasoning hits from 56.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 48.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,296 of 28,364 speakers). This Andy Green is worse (more manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Andy Green
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠64%Andy Green (selected)49%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.7% percentile
48.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos56.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 43.9%43.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 43.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos