Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video177.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andy Byford results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 386.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 177.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (19,152 of 26,155 speakers). This Andy Byford is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Andy Byford
Speaker details
Total words: 177.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos177.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 47.9%47.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 47.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.5%Composition/Division: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos