Speaker summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Wilson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 270.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,493 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Wilson is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Andrew Wilson
Speaker details
Total words: 172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
21.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos172 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 38.8%38.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos