Speaker summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos52.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Gray results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 120.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,374 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Gray is worse (more manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Andrew Gray
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510070.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos52.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos