Speaker summary
56% 7 analyzed articles/videos 798.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Giuliani results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Begging the Question , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 136.916 hits . Analysis detected 1,347.462 faulty-reasoning hits from 798.333 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,719 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Giuliani is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Andrew Giuliani
Speaker details
Total words: 798.333
Content count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos798.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.3% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst