Speaker summary
66% 1 analyzed article/video 155.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Friedman results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 51.209 hits . Analysis detected 388.59 faulty-reasoning hits from 155.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,105 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Friedman is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Andrew Friedman
Speaker details
Total words: 155.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 13.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos155.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 28.5% 28.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 26.8% 26.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 25.1% 25.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 12.0% 12.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.9% 13.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst