Speaker summary
66%1 analyzed article/video155.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Friedman results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 51.209 hits. Analysis detected 388.59 faulty-reasoning hits from 155.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of 19% (23,105 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Friedman is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Andrew Friedman
Speaker details
Total words: 155.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
13.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos155.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.1%25.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos