Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Ashiofu results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 194.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,943 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Ashiofu is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Andrew Ashiofu
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.1% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos