Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video11 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Arabaka results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 11 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (248 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Arabaka is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Andrew Arabaka
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 11
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos11 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos