Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video42.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andres E. Chait results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Begging the Question, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 38.775 hits. Analysis detected 111.775 faulty-reasoning hits from 42.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,443 of 28,364 speakers). This Andres E. Chait is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Andres E. Chait
Speaker details
Total words: 42.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
34.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos