Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video80.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Mendias results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 47.672 hits. Analysis detected 97.036 faulty-reasoning hits from 80.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,288 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrea Mendias is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Andrea Mendias
Speaker details
Total words: 80.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
31.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos80.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.2%50.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.9%15.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 7.5%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos