Speaker summary
ā 100%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Bernstein results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Genetic Fallacy, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 100% (244 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrea Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Andrea Bernstein
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 100%Andrea Bernstein (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

99% percentile
025507510099.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos